With "transient" you mean for those instances where the throttle moves? In my case I do not use MAP for transient fuelling at all- it is disabled. MS allows you to do that but I use only TPSdot ie when movement in TPS position is detected.bkbridges wrote:Have you adjusted your transient fueling at all?
I would not have thought so, but using a modified carbed intake, I'm seeing ghosts everywhere.... This fuel map is the fuel required under stable conditions, ie there should be zero throttle movement but of course the MAP (manifold pressure) signal can become quite lively.bkbridges wrote:Your intake and TB should not have such a profound effect that you cannot smooth out your fueling table. It is possible that you need to add some dMap (fuel added/subtracted due to the rate of change of the map signal) as the outer blades open up, adding air around/reducing vacuum at mid throttle.
Yep, in fact the PC user interface (Tunerstudio) uses the datalog data in real time to tune the fuel map for you. All you have to do is drive the car. In this instance though, I have found that the software gets all confused in that area of the bulge and I had to tune that area manually. But it can also save the datalog data to a file on the PC for later study using "Megalogviewer"bkbridges wrote:Can the MS2 run log files? Looking at the actual AF as well as the TPS RPM MAP etc will help determine whats up.
I hear you. The TQ carb has a 3/8" heat isolator. I might just pop that under the TB as a "spacer" to see if I can see anything change. The guys in the video used a 1" but that will not be an option for me as then the air cleaner would most certainly interfere with the bonnet (hood).bkbridges wrote: I wouldn't do any mechanical modifications yet (spacer, plenum, etc) as IMO most any manifold (even a chunk of pipe) can be made to work as an intake manifold with the right tuning.
I would also have thought that with mapped EFI, one should be able to tune to perfection, and this map does deliver the AFRs that I want, but that does not make it right necessarily. If there are REALLY air flow issues (and I'm still not sure if there are) those must surely be addressed first before accepting the fuel map as the final deal.