MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

You can discuss anything here, Jensen related or not. Technical discussions / questions may be moved to the correct Forum.
StevenLA
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:18 am

MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by StevenLA »

Dear Members,

Good afternoon from Los Angeles !

I picked up my MK 2 from the storage to place the original MK 2 wheels back on the car.

I had to change the front rotors, calipers, brackets, nuts, center caps etc and new tires to finally have it finished.

I managed to get the original style center caps on Ebay and here they are in great condition.

I put the other MK 3 rims and tires on the third Jensen sitting over at the storage.

Personally I like the MK 2 rims on the car, comments are of course welcome.

I need to change all 4 shocks and check the springs and do something about the damaged body work ,
which I will discuss in another Post.

Cheers Steven.
Attachments
thumbnail (14).jpg
thumbnail (14).jpg (172.75 KiB) Viewed 2423 times
thumbnail (16).jpg
thumbnail (16).jpg (195.42 KiB) Viewed 2423 times
thumbnail (19).jpg
thumbnail (19).jpg (140.79 KiB) Viewed 2423 times
thumbnail (12).jpg
thumbnail (12).jpg (184.98 KiB) Viewed 2423 times
IMG_9328.JPG
IMG_9328.JPG (177.49 KiB) Viewed 2423 times
User avatar
ajc9415
Posts: 463
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Sutton, Surrey, UK

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by ajc9415 »

Looks great with the correct wheels. I know you have problems with your paint based on your other post but the car looks good.
Adrian
1974 Interceptor Mk III 2240-9415
JOC Member 9648
Mark1Stu
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:30 pm

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by Mark1Stu »

Congratulations. That's a really desirable, classy looking car - even with the hopefully minor paint defects. Lovely panel gaps too.

I often wonder what possesses owners to bling their car up, put on an ill-fitting louvred bonnet in place of the serviceable original etc etc - more so now I've seen your sharp looking understated example.

I guess it doesn't rain where you live (I belatedly realised you've temporarily removed the wiper arms) :lol:
User avatar
DPP
Posts: 1287
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by DPP »

Lovely, I do like to see Mk1 and 2 Interceptors with the correct wheels.
I know they are much more expensive to refurbish than GKNs but they really do finish off an early car.

I hope your going to enter that in concours :)
Dave Pearce
Oily Rag Classics
Jensen FF 119/133
Jensen FF 119/182
Jensen Interceptor III 128/4430
Richie
V8 Lover
Posts: 4223
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:08 am
Location: Near Cardiff

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by Richie »

That looks the business and definitely worth the effort. Good move.
What tyres do you have fitted there?
User avatar
slotcarone
Posts: 968
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:38 pm

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by slotcarone »

Looks great! I would not worry about the springs. Your car sits if anything too high in the front indicating the springs are fine. The rear height is perfect. Why do you thing the shocks need attention? :)
1972 Interceptor III
133-5612
VFK44
Co-Administrator
Posts: 7721
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Epping Essex UK
Contact:

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by VFK44 »

Very smart looking car. It sits just right on the Rostyles and big tyres. You could enter the Concours - I don't think it requires a photo shot from above, hint hint!
"It is a mistake to try to look too far ahead. The chain of destiny can only be grasped one link at a time."
Sir Winston Churchill
StevenLA
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:18 am

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by StevenLA »

Good afternoon from Los Angeles !

Thank you for all your kind comments.

The tires on the car are Pirelli 215 x 70 15, I wanted a bigger tire, the other 60 inch tires were a little to small to fill the wheel well.

The cost of converting back to the original rims was around two thousand dollars, refurbished rims,new tires, new calipers, new rotors, new lock nuts, and also refurbished MK 2 brackets.

I wondered why does the front of the car sit so high ?

I thought the problem was the springs or the shocks, any other suggestions on how to correct this ?

The car drives very well and seems a lot faster than my 72 MK 3,which is a G numbered car built in 71 and has the same 383 motor ?

Anyway, I would love to buy a MK 1 someday, anyone know of a descent priced MK 1 here in the US ?

Have a wonderful week wherever you are in the World !

Regards Cheers Steven.
User avatar
kees
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:35 pm
Location: Heerjansdam NL

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by kees »

The story is Jensen had to raise the front of the car to comply with US requirements on the height of the head lamps. So they fitted taller springs.
Kees Oudesluijs
User avatar
Steve Payne
MASSIVE RED CARD
MASSIVE RED CARD
Posts: 5741
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:51 pm
Location: Witney , Oxfordshire
Contact:

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by Steve Payne »

You can buy shorter springs. Well worth doing.

Steve
JOC official Lightning engineer
Richie
V8 Lover
Posts: 4223
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:08 am
Location: Near Cardiff

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by Richie »

Is the MK3 G series 383 lower compression than the E series 383 that the MK2 came with?

Was there an F series?
User avatar
kees
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:35 pm
Location: Heerjansdam NL

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by kees »

Steve Payne wrote:You can buy shorter springs. Well worth doing.

Steve
This will also return the car to the originally intended geometry of the front wheels.
Kees Oudesluijs
User avatar
Pymmie
Posts: 2652
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Newton Abbot , Devon

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by Pymmie »

Richie wrote:Is the MK3 G series 383 lower compression than the E series 383 that the MK2 came with?

Was there an F series?
Yep , G series a lot lower compression than an E.

Approx 10% down on power

Regards

John P
Mk3 Int 128/4451 - SW Area Rep (Devon/Cornwall)

Understeer - Hitting the fence with the front of the car
Oversteer - Hitting the fence with the rear of the car
Horsepower -How fast you hit the fence
Torque - How far you take the fence with you
User avatar
Steve Payne
MASSIVE RED CARD
MASSIVE RED CARD
Posts: 5741
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:51 pm
Location: Witney , Oxfordshire
Contact:

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by Steve Payne »

kees wrote:
Steve Payne wrote:You can buy shorter springs. Well worth doing.

Steve
This will also return the car to the originally intended geometry of the front wheels.
Kees Oudesluijs
It would probably be a good idea to rebush the front suspension if you do replace the springs.

Also don't be tempted to cut them down, the shorter springs I believe are a little firmer.

Steve
JOC official Lightning engineer
User avatar
Chris_R
JOC General Secretary
Posts: 5785
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:19 am
Location: South West London

Re: MY MK 2 WITH THE ORIGINAL RIMS BACK ON THE CAR !

Post by Chris_R »

Richie wrote:Was there an F series?
F series engines were all in USA exports.
Chris
JOC Member 6116
--------------------------------------------------
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”