Open for discussion

You can discuss anything here, Jensen related or not. Technical discussions / questions may be moved to the correct Forum.
User avatar
Chris_R
JOC General Secretary
Posts: 6577
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:19 am
Location: South West London

Re: Open for discussion

Post by Chris_R »

hemi wrote:Just thinking if that Webasto roof is going to stay in place? I can imagine the low pressure at speed above the roof will be trying to suck that thing off its rails..
I've often wondered about the ballooning of Webasto and Convertible hoods at speed. Is it low pressure on the outside or is it a pressure build up on the inside that causes it?
_MG_3422c.jpg
_MG_3422c.jpg (172.82 KiB) Viewed 3432 times
_MG_3426c.jpg
_MG_3426c.jpg (181.79 KiB) Viewed 3432 times
Chris
JOC Member 6116
--------------------------------------------------
User avatar
RAP72
V8 Lover
Posts: 4297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:11 pm
Location: Huntingdon, cambs
Contact:

Re: Open for discussion

Post by RAP72 »

Were you never in the Air Traing Corps or CCF
Attachments
image.gif
image.gif (8.41 KiB) Viewed 3420 times
User avatar
Ian Northeast
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Horley, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Open for discussion

Post by Ian Northeast »

Ah, I was waiting to see who'd be the first to spot that!

This was of course considered, the webasto alas has been removed and stored for later use. At the International I presented my first replacement some Wickes perspex and gaffer tape.
I am hoping to have a permenant solution before the roll cage goes in, hopefully in the next month.

Ian
Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana.
User avatar
Robinson D
Posts: 1166
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:34 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: Open for discussion

Post by Robinson D »

Keep us posted on your progress! I would love to be out there with my 8.0-liter MKII with GVO, but such is not in the cards for me. Thanks for the inspiration.
Restoring a MKII, 125/5052
User avatar
hemi
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 7:55 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Open for discussion

Post by hemi »

Ha!

You could just open the thing and let the breeze be part of the experience :shock: :P

Matt
Interceptor II, 123/3936
kenny38
Posts: 1180
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 8:24 am
Location: Australia

Re: Open for discussion

Post by kenny38 »

You could also remove it completely and stand up with one hand on the wheel and the other hand(stop that at the back!) in a nazi salute.That should get rid of the camber to the road side where it belongs. Kenny38 :P
User avatar
Ian Northeast
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Horley, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Open for discussion

Post by Ian Northeast »

Further update,
After doing some research and scome scrimping and saving I have finally got hold of my new front brake set up.
Thanks to Andy down at Rally Design in Kent (a very helpful and knowledegable chap) I have a pair of huge front rotors some moutning bells to machine and some equally huge four pot calipers.
I went for the four pots for two reasons, they are significantly chepaer than six pots and with the larger piston diameter should give at least equal braking as the six pots.

Ian
Attachments
DSC_00531.JPG
DSC_00531.JPG (145.49 KiB) Viewed 3236 times
Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana.
User avatar
Robinson D
Posts: 1166
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:34 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: Open for discussion

Post by Robinson D »

You're going to like the Wilwood's. They were transformative on my MKII:
Attachments
Jensen 004.JPG
Jensen 004.JPG (143.8 KiB) Viewed 3213 times
Restoring a MKII, 125/5052
User avatar
Ian Northeast
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Horley, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Open for discussion

Post by Ian Northeast »

Slow progress at the moment, as work keeps getting in the way!!

I have mangaed to test fit the new rotors, so I could calculate the caliper mounting bracket dimensions.

It wasn't until I put them next to each other I realised quite how different they are!

Ian
DSC_0059.JPG
DSC_0059.JPG (182.3 KiB) Viewed 3048 times
Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana.
User avatar
Martin R
Posts: 5942
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: Chipping Norton, & Sydney Australia

Re: Open for discussion

Post by Martin R »

I suspect you'll notice a MASSIVE difference in braking with those!
Nice one Ian :D
FF MK1 119/100
Interceptor MK3 136/8514
JOC Member 8905
ajm541s
Posts: 1689
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:28 am
Location: BATH, UK

Re: Open for discussion

Post by ajm541s »

RAP72 wrote:Were you never in the Air Traing Corps or CCF
Us lads in CCFs were too busy digging holes, mate!
Tony Marshall
JML 1967-74

JOC 7828
User avatar
RAP72
V8 Lover
Posts: 4297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:11 pm
Location: Huntingdon, cambs
Contact:

Re: Open for discussion

Post by RAP72 »

ajm541s wrote:
RAP72 wrote:Were you never in the Air Traing Corps or CCF
Us lads in CCFs were too busy digging holes, mate!

You should have joined the RAF section. Funny that I was just reading the Heat evacuation thread and thought about posting a suggestion to invert a wing at the rear of the engine bay to creat a Venturi to drag the hot air down but can't work out whether this would affect handling, so didn't post.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”