Early Interceptor

You can discuss anything here, Jensen related or not. Technical discussions / questions may be moved to the correct Forum.
Post Reply
Arcnewal
Posts: 503
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:17 am
Location: England

Early Interceptor

Post by Arcnewal »

Anyone know the story behind this early Interceptor and that unique headlight treatment?

DVLA states it was lat taxed June 01, 1979.

Image
Photo apparently taken on 24/06/1973 at Beaulieu.
User avatar
DaveT
JOC 541 Registrar
Posts: 2124
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:33 am
Location: colchester UK

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by DaveT »

the club has records showing the owner at the time of the Beaulieu meeting and the chassis number for this car. I am not sure I want to make this information public on the forum. What kind of answer were you hoping for?

Dave
Dave Turnage
Colchester

JOC 8674
JOC 541 Registrar
541S, 100/1061
541R, 6002/387 (now in lots of pieces!)
Alvis speed 25 DHC
User avatar
RockyUSA
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:10 am
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by RockyUSA »

Lots of cool cars in that photo....
‘71 TVR Vixen 2500 - (M Series Tribute)
'72 Interceptor III - 133/5597
'73 DeTomaso Pantera
'74 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ-40
'95 Jaguar XJS Convertible
User avatar
Chris_R
JOC General Secretary
Posts: 6577
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:19 am
Location: South West London

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by Chris_R »

Arcnewal wrote:Anyone know the story behind this early Interceptor and that unique headlight treatment?
Well, one thing for sure is whoever stuck those headlights on had absolutely zero sense of style and design!
Chris
JOC Member 6116
--------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Jens
Dr. Umlaut & Area Rep for Germany
Posts: 4751
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:17 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany
Contact:

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by Jens »

Chris_R wrote:
Arcnewal wrote:Anyone know the story behind this early Interceptor and that unique headlight treatment?
Well, one thing for sure is whoever stuck those headlights on had absolutely zero sense of style and design!
Completely disagree Chris - a way better look than the ugly duckling front of the standard Early Interceptor.
In order of appearance:

(sold) C-V8 Mk III 112/2432
541 S 102/1035
(sold) FF MkII 127/243 (sold)
Healey Mk II 1140/14406
(sold)Jensen GT 1610/30257(sold)
Scimitar GTE SE5
Gordon Keeble #21
User avatar
Joerg
JOC Early Cars Registrar
Posts: 2755
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by Joerg »

:shock: ugly ???? :shock: :shock:
I own some of the odd Jensen 8)
User avatar
Chris_R
JOC General Secretary
Posts: 6577
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:19 am
Location: South West London

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by Chris_R »

Nope, sorry, I think the front on that one was ruined. Incorporating twin headlights is difficult and requires a different frontal style to make it work properly. These have just been stuck on the front with no real thought for form or style.
Attachments
Jensen_Interceptor_cabriolet_195x.jpg
Jensen_Interceptor_cabriolet_195x.jpg (149.04 KiB) Viewed 2992 times
Chris
JOC Member 6116
--------------------------------------------------
colin7673
now normal...
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:54 am
Location: Spalding Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by colin7673 »

I think It just might have been a customers requirement, because the wings have been made to suit the car and fit the twin heads lights.. It doesn't look out of place.
Only working half a day now.
http://www.jensensontour.co.uk
Mark1Stu
Posts: 2479
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:30 pm

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by Mark1Stu »

Interesting how we see things differently. I thought it was a typical mod of the 70's era to try and breath new life into an old looking round wing car. Looks a bit heavy handed to be a factory mod to me. But of course, pure speculation on my part.

I guess if the work maintained owner enjoyment and interest in the car, helping it to survive, then it's been worthwhile.
User avatar
Joerg
JOC Early Cars Registrar
Posts: 2755
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by Joerg »

Mark is right, that was common modification in the 70th.
On Volkswagen Käfer they used the head lights of the NSU TT to make it look faster.
Body modification was normally GFRP.
Attachments
VW_Kaefer_1970.jpg
VW_Kaefer_1970.jpg (66.84 KiB) Viewed 2905 times
van_doppelscheinwerfer_595.jpg
van_doppelscheinwerfer_595.jpg (214.38 KiB) Viewed 2905 times
1_doppelscheinwerfer.jpg
1_doppelscheinwerfer.jpg (110.18 KiB) Viewed 2905 times
I own some of the odd Jensen 8)
mikebyrne
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:35 am
Location: North Essex

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by mikebyrne »

There was a heavily modified one around at the time of the photo. (Beaulieu , second JOC rally.) The one I am thinking about was chromed all over the place, even the engine block had been chromed.
Dave Barnet might remember the car. The owner at that time was a little eccentric may I say.
I believe it was written off in a bad smash.
Mike.
Early Jensen Enthusiast
aka The Ozard of Wix.
Has owned:
Jensen PWA 10 2538 LGX 774 1950
Jensen 541 PWX 164 chassis no. 22/5206
541 alloy bodied prototype.
several other 541's
Indian 101Scout
JOC member number 2
Len Jackson was number 1
AH1951
Posts: 3836
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 5:07 pm

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by AH1951 »

They look much better upside-down.
Twins.png
Twins.png (869.45 KiB) Viewed 2875 times
cannonball
Posts: 2979
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: CREWE

Re: Early Interceptor

Post by cannonball »

AH1951 wrote:They look much better upside-down.
Twins.png
Ha ha they do,,, :lol: :lol: :lol:
WATTS RACING TRANSMISSIONS, 07974 088375,
CLOBBER THE COMPETITION
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”